Saturday, May 25, 2019

Leadership Structure in the Local Church

Structure for Church Ministry By Geraldine Rowe A Paper Presented to Professor Dr. Epps In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For investigate for Scholarly Writing College of Biblical Studies Houston, Texas October 14, 2010 ? Leadership Structure for Church Ministry The local church has not exhibited consistent patterns of lay evanesceers. Most denominations articulate the Reformation doctrine of a universal priesthood, while vacillating with changing times and reduceures.At both the local and denominational levels organizations stick out expanded the role of lay persons which may or may not require them to be educated clergy. Organization structure of the local church whether modern or traditional empowers themselves to announce the word, administer the sacraments and to rallying cry and discipline ministers and laity. Believers in Christ connect simultaneously as a congregation to manage the work that Jesus requested. The general regard ass that can be acclimatized to fit the features of the local church were established by the early church to do ministry.These values can be directed to the constitution or bylaws of a localized place of worship in modern times. Concentration should be given up to the reason and objective of the local church preventing them from dropping into the complacency of unspoilt doing church. In architecture, one of the most significant notions is that the church balances between covenant theology and proliferated leadership roles. To explore this notion a closer look is given to church models and their leadership philosophies, beginning with the authority or head of the church.The first and most significant part of the churchs structure is the Head sheepman who is Jesus Christ (Ephesians 122-23, 415-16). Underneath the Head Shepherd, t here(predicate) is an assembly of under shepherds (overseers, elders or pastors). Historically, from the perspective of Anglicans, Puritans, and Presbyterians all early Baptist preacher s were lay, meaning they did not receive Episcopal or Presbyterian ordination. One example was Thomas Collier, who joined one of the seven London churches and served as an itinerant evangelist.He, through the use of the press gained great influence of Particular Baptists. Lay preachers were the chief means for the advancement of Baptist in the American frontier. Today, however the Pastor no longer functions merely as preachers, chief administrators or ordinances, counselors, and general leaders. They have become executives or administrators who perform numerous functions. They interface disillusionment when they discover that it requires something very different. They become the hired turn over instead of immortal-called ministers.The common options for handling this issue seems to be emphasize the equipping role of the pastor and other professionals while seeking to acknowledge an array of functions and leadership in the churches today. The leadership of the church depends largel y upon its doctrine and how closely the pastor is to follow its bylaws. One view is that of the church as a covenant community of interests which has deep roots in biblical as well as free-church traditions. Max Stackhouse wrote on free church Calvinism which had a strong influence on the Puritans who left the Church of England.He describes it like this A covenantal people live under the law of God, and find themselves empowered to live together by the love of God. God is the source and sustainer of the covenant ecclesia. Though the initiator of the covenant of God, the church also in a sense a spontaneous community. The covenant is voluntary in the sense that it is not a community given by birth in a family, class or nation. People must spot to be an active member. This is so even if, in another sense, it is not voluntary at all. God initiates the covenant, humans only receive it, as stand for by baptism. This doctrine if properly adopted eliminates the temptation of self-intere st, isolation and the disregard for the claims of others. Statistic show however that among Southern Baptist Churches the denomination has been restricted by geography and economist to the South, and by racism. Additionally, m some(prenominal) southern Baptist have embraced the pluralistic value of urban life and advance education. Covenantalism, in its original intent could guide a ashes which recognizes different influences and authorities, and to give a voice to diverse groups and individuals.A church is both an organism and an organization. According to New Testament writers the church is defined as the ashes of Christ (1 Corinthians 12) also the bride of Christ (Revelation 19). These scriptures personify the church as a living organism. This organism lives under the leadership of the spirit of Christ as it whole kit and caboodle in the life of believers which prompts them to begin a congregation. An effective leader strives to keep the congregation attached to its source of vitality thereby keeping people concentrate on the One who corporately gives them strength and direction.This organism can be dynamic or it can become weak and sickly. As an organism its life and energy must be c atomic number 18d for very much liken to one who would care for a living being. The Church is also an organization as defined by Webster. It is any unified, consolidated group of elements systematized whole a) a body of persons organized for some specific purpose. As an organization the Church has form, structure, a missionary station to perform, clientele, constituents, programs, a way of doing business, financial systems, a corporate culture, and numerous other attributes of any other organization whether secular or sacred.The effective leader needs to take the nature of its organization and attempt to lead the church carrying out its mission. Leaders of the Bible like Moses, Joshua, David, Nehemiah, Jesus, Paul and others had goals and envisioned the end results a s they pushed themselves and led others. either effective leader can enlist people around them to commit to common purpose. They motivate others to dream the dreams, see the visions, and work toward the goals that have been set. This servant leader strives to build trust between leader and effective balance so that leadership compliments one another.This frees him up to preach the gospel. When a leader is also task oriented he will do whatever it takes to accomplish the task at hand. People are not very important. The danger here is that the leader directs more attention to the organization than the organism. The most consistent lay leadership role in ministry in Baptist Churches has been that of deacon. The work of the Deacon is to serve tables, providing the noble Supper. They are to partner with the Pastor as bond servants and overseers agree to Phil 11.Likewise his attributes should reconcile with the description of overseer given in 1Tim 31-13. The position of Deacon and ot her church officers and ministries are accountable when heading up a successful church organization. Patterson makes this point clear in his writings about jumper cable from the second chair. A second chair leader may be defined as anyone in a subordinate whole whose influence with others adds value throughout the organization. It could refer to the second or the fourth or fifth person of the organization chart.According to this writer the second chair leader should learn from the paradoxes from the facial expression on the life of Joseph in the book of Genesis. If the overseers are out of order and dysfunctional, the entire congregation suffers from confusion and strife that eventually weakens the church preventing it to function according to its original purpose. The biblical purpose of the church is the Great Commission as utter in Matthew 2819-20. Its mission, or the way in which its purpose is carried out, is stated in Acts 242-47 as evangelism, discipleship, worship, minist ry, prayer, and fellowship.The leader of the second chair understands the mission of the church and has developed a vision of what the purpose of the church is and is committed to that mission and vision. In conclusion, many changes have taken place in the local church since its Reformation principals. Some of these changes have raised the awareness of social injustices and much progress has been made in the areas of diversity. Many of the post modern adjustments that were made in order to accommodate a diverse society however have proven to weaken its effectiveness in a dying world.Over a period of time the church has become stagnate and content with the way things are being done been under the umbrella of the church. Distractions such as church membership, financial budgets, and annual programs have taken the forefront of too many local congregations. They exist to survive or survive to exist and totally lose sight of its mandate to teach the Word of God, win people to a saving kn owledge of Christ, grow people in Christ- likeness, and minister to one another.The Leaders and Overseers should re-evaluate their agenda. They should nurture the passion for work to which they have been called and keep their eyes on the mission and purpose of the church or whatever group/organization they are leading. This will eradicate confusion, hostility, misunderstandings, controversy and selfish agendas. They should be determined to lead the church to develop strong, positive Kingdom agendas that clearly contributes to the advancement of the cause of Christ in the world.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.